Current:Home > MyAppeals court sends back part of Dakota Access oil pipeline protester’s excessive force lawsuit -Excel Money Vision
Appeals court sends back part of Dakota Access oil pipeline protester’s excessive force lawsuit
View
Date:2025-04-13 10:25:36
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — An appeals court has sent back part of a lawsuit brought by a protester of the Dakota Access oil pipeline, who alleged excessive force by law enforcement officers.
Eric Poemoceah, of Oklahoma, filed the federal court lawsuit in 2020 against Morton County, County Sheriff Kyle Kirchmeier, then-Sheriff of Cass County Paul Laney and other officers, including unidentified ones. He sought unspecified damages to be determined at trial.
Poemoceah alleged that during a demonstration in February 2017, when a protest camp was being evacuated, Bismarck Police Officer Benjamin Swenson tackled him, causing a pelvic fracture. He also alleged other injuries from other officers, and that the officers disregarded his pelvic injury and retaliated against him for livestreaming the events.
The defendants sought to dismiss the case. U.S. District Judge Daniel Traynor granted their motions to dismiss the case in December 2020. He said the officers were entitled to qualified immunity regarding use of force, and that Poemoceah didn’t sufficiently back up his claims.
Poemoceah appealed in 2021. On Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the judge’s dismissal of most of Poemoceah’s claims. But the panel said he “plausibly alleges a Fourth Amendment excessive force claim against Swenson,” and sent that claim back for further proceedings.
The Associated Press emailed attorneys for both sides, but did not immediately receive responses to requested comment.
The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s opposition to the pipeline’s Missouri River crossing drew thousands of people who demonstrated and camped for months in 2016 and 2017 near the crossing. Hundreds of arrests resulted from the sometimes-chaotic protests.
The multistate pipeline has been transporting oil since 2017, including during an ongoing, court-ordered environmental review process for the controversial river segment.
veryGood! (5718)
Related
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Music program aims to increase diversity in college music departments
- All the Bombshell Revelations in The Secrets of Hillsong
- Fear of pregnancy: One teen's story in post-Roe America
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Review: 'Yellowstone' creator's 'Lioness' misses the point of a good spy thriller
- As states start to get opioid settlement cash, few are sharing how they spend it
- Transcript: Sen. Richard Blumenthal on Face the Nation, June 18, 2023
- Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
- The dream of wiping out polio might need a rethink
Ranking
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- 29 Grossly Satisfying Cleaning Products With Amazing Results
- With 10 Appointees on the Ninth Circuit, Trump Seeks to Tame His Nemesis
- Here are the U.S. cities where rent is rising the fastest
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- The Politics Of Involuntary Commitment
- Alaska’s Hottest Month on Record: Melting Sea Ice, Wildfires and Unexpected Die-Offs
- California restaurant used fake priest to get workers to confess sins, feds say
Recommendation
Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
Ticks! Ick! The latest science on the red meat allergy caused by some tick bites
Would you like to live beyond 100? No, some Japanese say
Man arrested after allegedly throwing phone at Bebe Rexha during concert
Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
How an abortion pill ruling could threaten the FDA's regulatory authority
Miranda Lambert calls out fan T-shirt amid selfie controversy: 'Shoot tequila, not selfies'
Fear of pregnancy: One teen's story in post-Roe America