Current:Home > reviews3 ways you could reduce your Social Security check by mistake -Excel Money Vision
3 ways you could reduce your Social Security check by mistake
View
Date:2025-04-12 10:59:12
As a retiree, you'll probably depend on Social Security to cover at least some of your expenses. Social Security is guaranteed for life, and it's protected against inflation, so you'll likely want to earn as much as you can from it since it's such a reliable funding source.
Unfortunately, there are a few mistakes you could end up making that reduce the amount of money the Social Security Administration will provide to you. You could make these errors without realizing the implications, and that could have long-term financial consequences. You don't want that to happen, so be on the lookout for these three potential actions that could inadvertently reduce your Social Security checks.
1. Retiring before 35 years of work history
The first mistake could come from retiring too soon.
You become eligible for Social Security retirement benefits after earning 40 work credits. You can earn up to four per year, so you would need to work for at least 10 years. However, just because you are eligible to get retirement checks after working for a relatively short time doesn't mean that cutting your career short doesn't have consequences.
When your Social Security benefits are calculated, the amount you receive is based on a percentage of average wages over a 35-year period. Specifically, your 35 highest-earning years (after adjusting for wage growth) are included in your benefits formula. If you work for less than 35 years, this formula doesn't change. You still get average benefits based on a 35-year work history. The problem is that if you didn't work for long enough, some of the years counted in your formula will be years when your wage was $0.
Obviously, when you include the number $0 in any average, it brings your average down. As a result, working less than 35 years before retiring is going to shrink your Social Security benefits check. You should try to stay on the job for at least that long.
If you have increased your earnings over time, it can be a good idea to work longer than 35 years, so some early low-earning years can be replaced in your formula by later years when your salary was higher.
2. Working while on Social Security and under full retirement age
If you are already retired, you can also make some moves that will shrink your checks. Specifically, if you claimed Social Security benefits prior to your full retirement age (FRA), you are at risk of losing some benefits if you earn too much money.
In 2024, if you won't reach FRA at any time during the year and you earn more than $22,320, you lose $1 in benefits for every $2 extra earned. If you'll reach FRA sometime during the year, you can earn up to $59,520. After that you'll lose $1 in benefits for every $3 extra earned. Unfortunately, this can mean you end up getting a lot less money from Social Security than you might have expected.
You do eventually get back the benefits you forfeited by working too much. Your monthly benefit is recalculated at FRA to account for months you missed payments as a result of exceeding the earnings limits. However, it can take a lot of time for the small extra amount added to each check to make up for the income you passed up when your earnings from work got too high. Plus, if you aren't expecting to lose your benefits just because you go back to work, this can come as a huge shock that destabilizes your finances.
Double-dipping and earning income while collecting benefits is allowed after full retirement age, though, and you can earn as much as you want at that time without consequence.
3. Moving to a state that taxes benefits
Finally, you could end up losing Social Security benefits by mistake if you move to a state that taxes benefits. In most parts of the U.S., this isn't a concern. However, nine states impose taxes on Social Security under at least some circumstances. If you relocate to one of them and your income is high enough that your state will tax your retirement benefits, this could be a major financial setback — especially if you weren't expecting the tax hit.
Understanding all three of these moves that could potentially shrink your benefits can help you to make more informed choices about what actions you take while collecting Social Security. You don't want to make an error that costs you.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets" ›
veryGood! (48563)
Related
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- Turkey rules the table. But a poll finds disagreement over other Thanksgiving classics
- Officials identify man fatally shot on a freeway by California Highway Patrol officer
- Deliveroo riders aren’t entitled to collective bargaining protections, UK court says
- 'Most Whopper
- Words fail us, and this writer knows it. How she is bringing people to the (grammar) table
- Next 2 days likely to be this week’s busiest. Here’s when not to be on the road -- or in the airport
- Atlantic City casino profits fall 7.5% in 3rd quarter of 2023
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Prince Harry to appeal to UK government for evidence in lawsuit against Daily Mail publisher
Ranking
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Congo and the UN sign a deal for peacekeepers to withdraw after more than 2 decades and frustration
- Iowa official’s wife convicted of 52 counts of voter fraud in ballot-stuffing scheme
- Niger’s junta asks West Africa’s court to compel neighbors to lift coup sanctions, citing hardship
- Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
- Search is on for pipeline leak after as much as 1.1 million gallons of oil sullies Gulf of Mexico
- Willie Hernández, 1984 AL MVP and World Series champ with Detroit Tigers, dies at 69
- Wisconsin Supreme Court hearing arguments on redistricting that could result in new maps for 2024
Recommendation
Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
Dabo Swinney shares feelings about Donald Trump attending Clemson-South Carolina game
A 2-year-old is dead and 8 people are missing after a migrant boat capsized off Italy’s Lampedusa
Father of Taylor Swift Fan Who Died in Brazil Speaks Out on Tragedy
Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
College football bowl projections: Ohio State hurdles Michigan into playoff field
Horoscopes Today, November 21, 2023
Padres give Mike Shildt another chance to manage 2 years after his Cardinals exit