Current:Home > MySome companies plan to increase return-to-office requirements, despite risk of losing talent -Excel Money Vision
Some companies plan to increase return-to-office requirements, despite risk of losing talent
View
Date:2025-04-15 23:23:54
A quarter of U.S. companies will require its workers to show up at the office more often next year, even though doing so may cause some productive staff members to leave.
That's according to new findings from ResumeBuilder.com which surveyed 756 employers at companies with return-to-office policies in place since 2021. RTO mandates have been one of the most divisive issues in corporate America since the nation emerged from the pandemic, with companies and employees often clashing over policies.
Among companies planning to require an increased number of days in office, 86% cited productivity as the top reason for doing so. That was followed by a desire to improve company culture (71%), employee well-being (57%) and retention (55%).
However, the findings of at least one study on RTO mandates seems to contradict those motives. Research from the Katz Graduate School of Business at the University of Pittsburgh, found that RTO mandates have no impact on companies' financial performance. It also found that RTO policies can cause a "significant decline" in employee satisfaction. That may explain why 80% of companies in Resume Builder's survey said they have lost talent as a result of their RTO policy.
"Unfortunately, I think many business leaders make assumptions about things like productivity, culture, and employee well-being," Julia Toothacre, resume and career strategist at Resume Builder, said the report. "Productivity is a result of clear expectations and good management. Culture is driven by people, not physical spaces, and employee well-being is more about how people are managed, their stress levels, and the amount of flexibility they have."
The survey also found that 45% of companies will not push employees to come into the office more often next year, choosing to leave their current RTO policy as is. Another 21% said employees will be allowed to come in less frequently in 2025.
Still, an overwhelming 93% of business leaders believe employees should be physically present in the office and therefore support RTO mandates. Most employers currently require that employees work in office a certain number of days, with 38% enforcing a minimum of three days per week. Amazon, Apple, and Starbucks are among the companies now requiring workers to come in three days a week.
As work-life balance becomes a higher priority for employees, however, Toothacre says companies can expect more walkouts as a result of RTO mandates.
"People may have moved and aren't willing to move again to keep their position," she said. "It's also possible that there are familial responsibilities that require a flexible schedule or the need to be at home. Some people also like working from home or remotely and don't want to return to an office environment."
ResumeBuilder.com drew its results from a May survey of business owners, human resource managers, supervisors, CEOs, senior managers and other top decision-makers at companies. The respondents were all over age 25, made over $75,000 a year and had an education higher than a high school diploma.
Khristopher J. BrooksKhristopher J. Brooks is a reporter for CBS MoneyWatch. He previously worked as a reporter for the Omaha World-Herald, Newsday and the Florida Times-Union. His reporting primarily focuses on the U.S. housing market, the business of sports and bankruptcy.
TwitterveryGood! (48593)
Related
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- Claire Danes Gives Birth, Welcomes Baby No. 3 With Hugh Dancy
- Environmental Advocates Call on Gov.-Elect Wes Moore to Roll Back State Funding for Fossil Fuel Industry
- Ariana Madix Is Making Her Love Island USA Debut Alongside These Season 5 Singles
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- OceanGate suspends its commercial and exploration operations after Titan implosion
- Leaders and Activists at COP27 Say the Gender Gap in Climate Action is Being Bridged Too Slowly
- They're illegal. So why is it so easy to buy the disposable vapes favored by teens?
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Microsoft says Chinese hackers breached email, including U.S. government agencies
Ranking
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- Outnumbered: In Rural Ohio, Two Supporters of Solar Power Step Into a Roomful of Opposition
- Why government websites and online services are so bad
- The US Forest Service Planned to Increase Burning to Prevent Wildfires. Will a Pause on Prescribed Fire Instead Bring More Delays?
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- Environmental Advocates Call on Gov.-Elect Wes Moore to Roll Back State Funding for Fossil Fuel Industry
- Feeling Overwhelmed About Going All-Electric at Home? Here’s How to Get Started
- Claire Danes Gives Birth, Welcomes Baby No. 3 With Hugh Dancy
Recommendation
A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
Protesters Rally at Gas Summit in Louisiana, Where Industry Eyes a Fossil Fuel Buildout
What’s Good for Birds Is Good for People and the Planet. But More Than Half of Bird Species in the U.S. Are in Decline
How DOES your cellphone work? A new exhibition dials into the science
The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
8 mistakes to avoid if you're going out in the heat
This electric flying taxi has been approved for takeoff — sort of
The Pathway to 90% Clean Electricity Is Mostly Clear. The Last 10%, Not So Much